How to Safely Bridge Assets Across Chains
How cross-chain bridges work, and practical precautions given their real, documented risk.
Jump to section
What to remember
- Bridges move value between chains, typically by locking an asset and minting a wrapped version elsewhere.
- Bridges have been a frequent, well-documented target for exploits.
- Use official bridges, check for audits, and consider testing with smaller amounts first.
- A wrapped asset carries the issuing bridge's risk as an additional layer.
What a bridge does
A cross-chain bridge lets an asset move (or, more precisely, lets a representation of value move) from one blockchain to another — commonly by locking the original asset on its source chain and minting a corresponding wrapped version on the destination chain.
The original asset is locked, not destroyed, on the source chain while a wrapped version is minted on the destination chain.
Why bridges carry real, documented risk
A bridge is itself a piece of software, typically holding significant locked value, which has made bridges a frequent and well-documented target for exploits across the industry — bridging carries real technical risk distinct from simply holding an asset on a single chain.
Practical precautions
- Use official, well-established bridges linked directly from a project's own verified documentation, rather than an unfamiliar link.
- Check whether the bridge's contracts have been audited, and review what the audit actually covered.
- Consider bridging smaller test amounts first when using a bridge for the first time.
- Understand that a wrapped asset on the destination chain is only as trustworthy as the bridge that issued it.
A wrapped asset carries the bridge's risk, not just the original asset's
Holding a wrapped version of an asset means trusting the bridge that issued it, in addition to whatever risk the original asset itself carries — an additional, genuine layer of risk worth being aware of.
What to remember
- Bridges move value between chains, typically by locking an asset and minting a wrapped version elsewhere.
- Bridges have been a frequent, well-documented target for exploits.
- Use official bridges, check for audits, and consider testing with smaller amounts first.
- A wrapped asset carries the issuing bridge's risk as an additional layer.
Related concepts
Stablecoin Liquidity Fragmentation Across Chains
Read the article
Bridge Dependency Risk: When a Shared Bridge Fails
Read the article
Atomic Swap
Read the Atomic Swap glossary definition
Lock-and-Mint
Read the Lock-and-Mint glossary definition
How Cross-Chain Bridges Get Hacked
Read the article
What Happens When a Layer 2 Shuts Down: Blast and Abstract's Exit Deadlines
Read the article
Intent-Based Cross-Chain Swaps: What ERC-7683 Actually Defines (and Doesn't)
Read the article