How Staking Rewards Actually Work
What actually determines a staking reward's size, and the costs and risks that reduce it from the advertised rate.
Jump to section
What to remember
- Staking rewards are funded by new token issuance and transaction fees, expressed as an annualized rate.
- Validator commission, compounding frequency, and validator downtime/slashing all reduce the real reward below the advertised rate.
- The unbonding period is a real, often-overlooked opportunity cost, not just a waiting-period formality.
- Comparing two staking options means comparing net, after-commission, after-unbonding outcomes — not just the headline APY.
Where a staking reward actually comes from
A staking reward is generally funded from two sources: newly issued tokens the protocol creates as an incentive for validators, and transaction fees paid by users. The combined rate is usually expressed as an annualized percentage, but that advertised rate is a starting point, not the amount a staker actually receives.
What reduces the advertised rate
- Validator commission: delegating to a validator (rather than running one yourself) means a percentage of the reward goes to that validator before the rest reaches you.
- Compounding frequency: how often rewards are actually paid out and restaked changes the real annualized return, even at the same nominal rate.
- Downtime and slashing: a validator that goes offline or breaks protocol rules can be penalized, which flows through to anyone who delegated to it.
The unbonding period is a real cost, not a formality
Most proof-of-stake networks require a waiting period — an unbonding period — between requesting to unstake and actually regaining control of the tokens. During that window, the tokens typically keep earning nothing, which is a real opportunity cost that doesn't show up in the advertised APY at all.
How the advertised rate is reduced on the way to a real net reward, and the separate opportunity cost of the unbonding period.
The advertised APY is not the same as your net outcome
Validator commission, actual compounding frequency, downtime, and the unbonding period's opportunity cost can all pull a staker's real outcome meaningfully below the headline rate shown on a staking dashboard.
What to remember
- Staking rewards are funded by new token issuance and transaction fees, expressed as an annualized rate.
- Validator commission, compounding frequency, and validator downtime/slashing all reduce the real reward below the advertised rate.
- The unbonding period is a real, often-overlooked opportunity cost, not just a waiting-period formality.
- Comparing two staking options means comparing net, after-commission, after-unbonding outcomes — not just the headline APY.
Part of these learning paths
Related research and concepts
How to Read a Validator's Commission and Uptime History Before Delegating
Read the full guide
How Miner/Validator Revenue Diverges From Network Security Spend
Read the article
Staking APY Calculator
Open the calculator
Validator Staking Rewards Calculator
Open the calculator
Unbonding Opportunity Cost Calculator
Open the calculator
Validator Uptime Penalty Calculator
Open the calculator
Staking
Read the Staking glossary definition
Commission Rate (Validator)
Read the Commission Rate (Validator) glossary definition
Unbonding
Read the Unbonding glossary definition
Staking vs. Lending
Read the comparison
How to Stake Crypto: A Practical Walkthrough
Read the full guide
Liquid Restaking's Double-Slashing Risk, Explained
Read the article
BNB
Read the BNB research page
PoS Slashing Loss Calculator
Open the calculator